I’m not saying it’s not her but that looks nothing like her. If you’d showed me that picture, I wound never have guessed who it was, I doubt even her mother would recognise her.
About time! She looked way better in her Mean Girls days IMO. Curvier & Red. Definitely still nice tits & ass though, but definitely airbrushed as hell. I mean look what playboy did with Tara Reid.
This is a bit of a waste, I think Lohan needed to show some trim to move the needle a bit with this pictorial. She’s a curvy and naturally attractive woman, but unfortunately this feels like something you’ve seen before and moved on from. Playboy dropped the ball here, big-time.
A really boring shoot. I was expecting something exciting and titillating but this just seems generic and directionless. Wether Lindsay just isn’t the sexy girl everyone thinks she is or the director of the shoot didn’t know how to play it I don’t know but this is just all very “meh” and disappointing.
Really not a great set of photos, simply because they’re so obviously massively edited. When you see “candid” shots of her, you realize she has a great set of natural tits and good legs. She probably could stand to work on her ass and thighs a bit, but still, she’s got a figure most women would kill for and most men would jizz over. Considering how she’s (allegedly) drunk and drugged her way through her early life, she’s probably going to hit the wall badly in the near future, which is a shame because she’s got a solid foundation. I’m kind of glad they didn’t show “pink” in these photos, because I hate to think they’d have to photoshop that bit as well….
Overall, though, I’m always happy to see her without clothes.
this is another example of why Playboy sucks!! no pussy shots,too much airbrushing to the point she is unrecognizable,bad lighting and an uniinspired layout for someone who gives me hard one just watching wlak into a courtroom with those luscious tits.I have seen better layouts of lindsay in another magazines both clothed and semi nude.they dropped the ball big on this one.she has a great rack ,nice legs and i like the freckles and tattoos. standard Playboy generic shoot.they would have done better with a more natural less staged layout.she still has great tits but I REALLY wanted a pussy shot.
Dear photoshop fags: FUCK YOU AND YOUR EDITING!.. srsly. I cant fap to this lol. This shit looks awful.. she looks like a cartoon or something, and I dont fap to cartoons. These guys are soooooo lost.. looking for perfection that any wrinkle or curve has to be eliminated. So you end up with a smooth, lifeless, linear, generic THING; cause that is not a person.
I care, because the amount of processing on this photo is so high that they might as well have just rendered it with a computer. This looks like The Adventures of Tintin or something.
This is in no way representative of what she looks like naked. I mean shit, even those shadows on her left side look bizarre.
This is one giant soft focus, clone stamp, airbrush, liquefy filter, smudge tool mess! It’s done with enormous amounts of skill…I’m sure Playboy artists are top in their field but they have limits, and this stretched completely beyond them. IMO it doesn’t even look real.
Hate airbrush. I think a womans imperfection is what makes them hot. Like Cindy crawfords beauty mark (mole) on her face. Any other mole looks gross. Natural is what people want, i don’t want a woman to look like a cartoon character.
Simply wonderful!
Nice tits!
I knew the Breast shot in MACHETE was not her…the NIPS were dark…she has pleasently flesh colored nips
Man, those things are airbrushed into oblivion. lol They pulled out all the tricks for her.
I’m not saying it’s not her but that looks nothing like her. If you’d showed me that picture, I wound never have guessed who it was, I doubt even her mother would recognise her.
Another Marilyn Monroe inspired jaunt. MM might have had smaller boobs, but she was infinitely more attractive.
I like her better red. Great boobs, though.
That looks like an animated character. Which makes sense because the real Lohan is disfigured beyond belief.
She started to bore me the second she dyed her hair blonde and became allergic to food.
Curvy redheads with personality beat skinny blonde drug addicts in my book any day of the week.
About time! She looked way better in her Mean Girls days IMO. Curvier & Red. Definitely still nice tits & ass though, but definitely airbrushed as hell. I mean look what playboy did with Tara Reid.
She looks great, but the photoshop has clearly gone overboard.
maybe the official pictures looks better.
What a fucking waste of a million bucks. PB should have just bought the rights to the VF shoot, and reprinted them.
ha, lidsay going naked has been long overdue
She looks like a child who got into her mother’s make-up cabinet.
What’s the point when it doesn’t even look like her face.. disappointed.
Mm had nothing on LILO damn
BAD.
Never really thought she was attractive. She looks alright here, but seems to be heavily doctored. Either way nice tits
Very photo-shopped. I’m not turned on at all.
BTW, who is the girl with the big natural tits on her back in the Bang Bros Ad?
This is a bit of a waste, I think Lohan needed to show some trim to move the needle a bit with this pictorial. She’s a curvy and naturally attractive woman, but unfortunately this feels like something you’ve seen before and moved on from. Playboy dropped the ball here, big-time.
I just noticed her tats are p’shopped out. woops! haha
How is it justified to pay Lohan millions when she won’t even show her pussy???
Disappointing …
A really boring shoot. I was expecting something exciting and titillating but this just seems generic and directionless. Wether Lindsay just isn’t the sexy girl everyone thinks she is or the director of the shoot didn’t know how to play it I don’t know but this is just all very “meh” and disappointing.
Really not a great set of photos, simply because they’re so obviously massively edited. When you see “candid” shots of her, you realize she has a great set of natural tits and good legs. She probably could stand to work on her ass and thighs a bit, but still, she’s got a figure most women would kill for and most men would jizz over. Considering how she’s (allegedly) drunk and drugged her way through her early life, she’s probably going to hit the wall badly in the near future, which is a shame because she’s got a solid foundation. I’m kind of glad they didn’t show “pink” in these photos, because I hate to think they’d have to photoshop that bit as well….
Overall, though, I’m always happy to see her without clothes.
Lindsay is one hot lady. She can be bad with me anytime.
I have no idea why you did not approve my previous comment but anyways….
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-L4VQLJ.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-TQVX99.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-LMKL77.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-4R7ZQX.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-SMQHWB.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-1SUHOA.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-QOUWIL.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-NALN5R.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-SGMBPJ.jpg
http://www.grinshare.co m/view-J78PRK.jpg
Full spread; remove space between co and m in .com
Speaking of Mean Girls, I’d much rather have Lacey Chabert than Lohan.
The chick is Gianna Michaels. She is one of the most well-known Pornstars. She’s probably done over 1000 movies.
Wow, playboy did a good job airbrushing her.
this is another example of why Playboy sucks!! no pussy shots,too much airbrushing to the point she is unrecognizable,bad lighting and an uniinspired layout for someone who gives me hard one just watching wlak into a courtroom with those luscious tits.I have seen better layouts of lindsay in another magazines both clothed and semi nude.they dropped the ball big on this one.she has a great rack ,nice legs and i like the freckles and tattoos. standard Playboy generic shoot.they would have done better with a more natural less staged layout.she still has great tits but I REALLY wanted a pussy shot.
Dear photoshop fags: FUCK YOU AND YOUR EDITING!.. srsly. I cant fap to this lol. This shit looks awful.. she looks like a cartoon or something, and I dont fap to cartoons. These guys are soooooo lost.. looking for perfection that any wrinkle or curve has to be eliminated. So you end up with a smooth, lifeless, linear, generic THING; cause that is not a person.
Lame.
I would. Twice.
Yeah, the shoot’s a little boring, but she’s topless for fucks sake! And who cares about all the tabloid gossip when she has tits like that!
Airbrushed or not … those are some great tits. Which, really, is what we all wanted to see.
One word: AIRBRUSHED
Two words: HAS BEEN
Future: XXX Porn star
Airbrushed? Who cares? We all got a real good luck at what we actually wanted to see, and for once, a starlet didn’t disappoint.
That ass is a hell of a lot better than I thought it would be, too.
I’m all for tits..
But when you’re paying to see a famous birds tits it’d be nice if her face appeared above them.
This is not the case.
@soul
I care, because the amount of processing on this photo is so high that they might as well have just rendered it with a computer. This looks like The Adventures of Tintin or something.
This is in no way representative of what she looks like naked. I mean shit, even those shadows on her left side look bizarre.
This is one giant soft focus, clone stamp, airbrush, liquefy filter, smudge tool mess! It’s done with enormous amounts of skill…I’m sure Playboy artists are top in their field but they have limits, and this stretched completely beyond them. IMO it doesn’t even look real.
She sure knows how to give a guy a lift in that picture
Hate airbrush. I think a womans imperfection is what makes them hot. Like Cindy crawfords beauty mark (mole) on her face. Any other mole looks gross. Natural is what people want, i don’t want a woman to look like a cartoon character.
homos! you complain so much but you’d still fap on this! stupid kids
Lindsays rack is iconic and special haters be damned
Gorgeous figure wide shoulders huge breasts and slim waist