Jordan Carver Topless in ZOO Magazine

Even though Jordan Carver refuse to get topless for her own website and her copyright department is constantly demanding the removal of even the smallest hint of nipple she apparently has no problems with showing it all in Zoo magazine. Strange if you ask me? Full spread at Your-Daily Girl.

Pic from: Zoo Today

UPDATE: I’ve seen some sites claiming its a fake and simply a great Photoshop job. Speculation continues.

Image removed

21 thoughts on “Jordan Carver Topless in ZOO Magazine”

    • Its in the magazine so… but I suppose Zoo might have been told to drop any nipple pics and just published it anyway

      Reply
  1. Ha ha, why does the article say she has “natural” boobs? Ridiculous.

    Anyhow, nice nipple shot.

    Reply
  2. I doubt they’d be stupid enough to publish pictures they weren’t meant to. Not if they want to work with her again.

    She’s smokin’, I couldn’t care less if her tits are fake – I’d motorboat those puppies all night long.

    Reply
  3. Lol. It’s not like you can see an awful lot anyway.

    All the pics in the spread shes covering some of her boobs..

    Can’t say I’m that bothered though. Fuck ’em if they can’t do the job properly.

    Reply
  4. Its funny how all of these celebs shout “PHOTOSHOP” the moment something like this pops up.

    Remember the Blake Lively leak? lol.

    A lot of people photoshop celeb photos. Stupid celebs think they can fool us but the reality is if they are paying attention to certain photos, those photos are probably real.

    Reply
  5. I don’t know if its shopped, seems to be about the same place the nips are whenever she is covering them with just her fingertips.

    Reply
  6. It was probably a mistake (intentional) on the magazine’s side , as a photographer, they edit and re-edit, its not like Zoo needs her business they’ve got a long line of models, sometimes the “exclusives” are worth the risk

    Reply
  7. Nice, but I need more than a glimpse. I would prefer Jordan get them out good and proper, like she means it.

    Reply
  8. I’ll believe it’s fake when I see the “unaltered” photo. Of course, if there wasn’t a nipple there it would just look weird, so I’m gonna say it’s real.

    Reply
  9. I agree that that’s exactly where her nipple should be, based on all of the pics where she’s covering them with her hands. It would actually seem weird if there WASN’T a nipple there.

    And yeah, them claiming that she’s “natural” is just ridiculous. Who do they think they’re fooling?

    Reply
  10. It’s hardly even a great photoshop. There are far prettier girls both in Zoo magazine aswell as on on here with better and most importantly natural breasts and none of them with their heads so far stuck up their arses as this girl.

    Reply

Leave a Comment